“Ghosts” by Henrik Ibsen Review

98Ghosts is the story of Helen Alving, a widow who is haunted by the many mistresses of her deceased husband and by her son who has inherited syphilis from his philandering father. Ghosts is a scathing indictment of Victorian society in which Ibsen refutes the notion that if one simply fulfills one’s duty rather than following one’s desires then a good and noble life will be achieved. Scandalous in its day for its frank discussion of venereal disease and marriage infidelity, Ghosts remains to this day an intense psychological drama and sharp social criticism.

Another play written by Henrik Ibsen, which is over 130 years old.

First of all the characters in this one are shit. They are super flat and for the most part they are hard to tell them apart. None of them are unique but they are all boring as fuck. I personally feel like Oswald is the most likeable character in this whole play. Yes he is the typical rich white kid but still there is something to him.

The plot itself was okay. It isn’t something to talk about, it is simply something you read and just forget about it. The whole plot felt like it was something a person would tell on their deathbed.

Drama is a big part of this play. This drama for the most part is involving the main character which is haunted by the lovers which her husband had

This whole play might have been something big and good back in the day but it isn’t that today. Because there are a lot of stereotypes like women should be at home and clean the house and men should be in town and work..

I give this book 1 / 5

"A Doll’s House" by Henrik Ibsen Review

100A Doll’s House portrays the disintegration of the marriage between Nora and Torvald Helmer in the wake of a major revelation. Nora, a seemingly frivolous housewife, has secretly been working to pay off a loan she took out illegally in order to save Torvald’s life.

This book is sort of a three-act play written by Norwegian author named Henrik Ibsen. This book shows a landmark in the development of truly independent female heroines, rejecting the patriarchy they were socialised to accept unconditionally.

This play or what else you want to call it shows some very incredible and realistic characters. The main character Nora have some huge transformation as the play goes on. She went from never making decisions over herself or anything to began to take the action for herself and decide over herself. That’s who a real character development should be like.

The end in this play may be controversial for some people, because of the action and decisions which Nora takes.

We have very few characters in this book. And again we go back to the “quality over quantity” rule.

Writing style is old timely and fun to read. It defiantly sets the mood in this book and makes it even more fun to read. Descriptions are good too.

The language as you may think is very old, but it also sets the mood even more than the writing.

Dialogs, when we look at the dialogs now, almost 150 years later, were pretty good. There were some dialogs which made cringe but for the most part you could survive them.

I give this book 4 / 5