Book Reviews
The original tale is much better but also darker then the version kids see.
It is different but not that different from what you might remember from first hearing this tale as a kid.
The plot here are very good but also dark which is the mix which I personally like a lot.
The writing style here was very old and you could feel the vibe of old the Europe which was amazing for me.
I Give This Story 4 / 5
The original tale is much better but also darker then the version kids see.
It is different but not that different from what you might remember from first hearing this tale as a kid.
The plot here are very good but also dark which is the mix which I personally like a lot.
The writing style here was very old and you could feel the vibe of old the Europe which was amazing for me.
I Give This Story 4 / 5
The original tale is much better but also darker then the version kids see.
It is different but not that different from what you might remember from first hearing this tale as a kid.
The plot here are very good but also dark which is the mix which I personally like a lot.
The writing style here was very old and you could feel the vibe of old the Europe which was amazing for me.
I Give This Story 4 / 5
The original tale is much better but also darker then the version kids see.
It is different but not that different from what you might remember from first hearing this tale as a kid.
The plot here are very good but also dark which is the mix which I personally like a lot.
The writing style here was very old and you could feel the vibe of old the Europe which was amazing for me.
I Give This Story 4 / 5
Mrs Foster has recently begun to suspect her husband of purposely exacerbating her pathological fear of missing a train or plane. She is continuously badgered by her husband, Eugene, who makes a habit of waiting until the last minute to leave the house.
This short story by Roald Dahl was okay for the most part it wasn’t the greatest thing written by him nor was it the worst thing written by him. This short story is really a dark and morbid tale.
The plot in this short story wasn’t the most entertaining and interesting but it was enjoyable for the most part there were couple of moments while reading this one where I wanted to DNF this short story because it began so boring and uninteresting .
The characters in this short story were okay for the most part. It didn’t dislike them but I also didn’t like them. I didn’t care about them at all so I didn’t bother to have any specific thoughts about them. But the main character really made it impossible for me to even try liking her because she submissive to everything and she allowed everyone especially her husband treat her very cruelly.
The ending here was really the biggest problem for me with this short story because it really ruined it for me.
I Give Story 3 / 5
So yet again we are reviewing another poem but this time it is a poem by Emily Dickinson.
It was a short poem.
The writing style here wasn’t that great. It could have something to do with the old English in this one.
The plot of this poem was okay but it didn’t work for me. I kind of wish that I’ve have enjoyed this one more.
This one was my second word of Emily Dickinson. And so far I wish that I enjoyed her work more because it feels like a lots of people really love her work and I just don’t so far.
I give this poem 1 / 5
The main part of the story is set a couple of years after the events of “Salem’s Lot”.
So this little short story takes place after the event in Salem’s lot which as you might know is one of my least favourite books from Stephen King.
This short story didn’t quit feel like something written by Stephen King, it rather felt like something written by some who tried to impersonate Stephen King.
The writing style was kind of okay. It wasn’t good nor bad. But the writing style has nothing much to talk about.
I give this short story 3 / 5
The story begins with a narrator explaining that he is on his deathbed and feels the need to share a particular story before he dies. He tells of a quiet and slightly mad older man who lives in the Gray’s Inn with his pet cat. The mad is haggard and haunted, looking older than his years and terrified of church bells. A young man named Williams (the narrator) moves into to the Inn and tries to befriend the old man and get him to share his knowledge. It is revealed that the man is Lord Northam of England.
So this was another pretty average short story from H.P Lovecraft. I had high expectations for this short story but it did disappoint me a little bit.
This short story also felt like it wasn’t complete and that the some parts of the short story are missing.
The writing style was pretty okay and it probably the writing style it was the best part of this short story.
The plot was okay but it had potential to be better. It somehow felt poor and that something was off with it. It would be much better if this short story was a novel instead of a short story.
Some parts of this short story had some creepy parts in it, which this short story needs to get points for.
I was missing from this short story more details and descriptions. This short story would be so much better of it had more details and descriptions.
I give this short story 2 / 5
The story is narrated as a “found manuscript” penned by Karl Heinrich, Graf von Altberg-Ehrenstein, a lieutenant-commander in the Imperial German Navy during the days of World War I. Altberg begins by declaring that he has decided to document the events leading up to his untimely end in order to “set certain facts” before the public, aware that he will not survive to do so himself.
Another pretty average short story from no other than H.P Lovecraft.
The writing style was probably the best part of this short story, it was actually super good. It makes you imagine indoor head what you read in this short story. This short story really proves that the writing style is as important as the plot itself.
The plot itself in this short story however was pretty average. I think that H.P Lovecraft really nailed it, because I have a feeling that if someone else wrote this story it wouldn’t be as good as it really as.
And I gotta be a little bit honest here with you about the fact that this short story is a slightly unusual story for H.P Lovecraft.
And I need to give this short story extra points for being sort of a claustrophobic underwater horror short story. I’m the person who is scared of deep seas and oceans so it works very good on me.
I give this short story 3 / 5
Gotta say that this short story was pretty average, it was okay but nothing more than that.
The writing style here was pretty basic and not much here to say more than that. It was good but sort of this didn’t feel like something Lovecraftian as you might expect.
The plot itself was okay, but I had hard time connecting with it so of course if I can’t connect with the plot then I can’t give the book / short story a good reading even if I want to.
The narrator of this short story was sort of a generic narrator which you can find in any book and short story with a narrator from 1900s.
I think that this short story had a little bit of potential to be better than it actually was.
I give this short story 3 / 5
